The 9/11 News Special You Never Saw is a 70-minute sequel to The Great Deception – a ground-breaking 44-minute video also by Barrie Zwicker. He was the first mainstream journalist in the world to go on air (in January 2002) and ask hard questions about the official story of 9/11. The Great Deception is a compilation of his series of seven commentaries on 9/11. In The Great Conspiracy, Zwicker updates and expands his critique. He analyzes the use of fear to befuddle the public. He reconstructs the so-called ?war on terrorism.? He examines in depth the failure of the military on 9/11 and George Bush?s highly inappropriate behavior that day. He finds the 9/11 Commission to be a total cover up operation. Throughout, he analyzes the role of the mainstream media as complicit in keeping the public massively misinformed and befuddled. And he suggests what we can do. Those who have seen both works find them complementary.
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Have Your Say! Rate This Film!
please wait...
Rating: 4.0/5 (6 votes cast)
Who's Afraid of an Open Debate? The Truth About the Commission on Presidential Debates (Full Version), 4.8 out of 5 based on 21 ratings
Cannabis is the world’s favourite drug, but also one of the least understood. Can cannabis cause schizophrenia? Is it addictive? Can it lead you on to harder drugs? Or is it simply a herb, an undervalued medicine?
Addiction specialist Dr John Marsden discovers that modern science is finally beginning to find answers to these questions. John traces the cannabis plants’ birthplace in Kazakhstan; finds the origins of our sensitivity to cannabis in the simple sea squirt; and shows just what it does to our brains.
He meets people who have been changed by this drug in drastically different ways – from those whose lives have been shattered to those who lives have been revived. More at BBC.
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Have Your Say! Rate This Film!
please wait...
Rating: 3.8/5 (4 votes cast)
Who's Afraid of an Open Debate? The Truth About the Commission on Presidential Debates (Full Version), 4.8 out of 5 based on 21 ratings
Thousands of synthetic chemicals are added to foods for a variety of reasons, including taste and appearance. Although well-intentioned, additives can have serious health consequences. The human body is not meant to process synthetic food additives, thus it can lead to chronic health problems. What can we do? Presented by Jennifer Kaumeyer, N.D.
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Have Your Say! Rate This Film!
please wait...
Rating: 5.0/5 (2 votes cast)
Who's Afraid of an Open Debate? The Truth About the Commission on Presidential Debates (Full Version), 4.8 out of 5 based on 21 ratings
Who’s Afraid of an Open Debate? The Truth About the Commission on Presidential Debates (Full Version)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Have Your Say! Rate This Film!
please wait...
Rating: 4.8/5 (21 votes cast)
2012 – The Commission on Presidential Debates is a private corporation headed by the former chairmen of the Republican and Democratic parties. The CPD is a duopoly which allows the major party candidates to draft secret agreements about debate arrangements including moderators, debate format and even participants. The result is a travesty riddled with sterile, non-contentious arguments which consistently exclude alternative voices that Americans want to hear.
This documentary also reveals the big corporations who “sponsor” the CPD and how third party candidates are purposely excluded. One of these sponsors, Annheiser Busch, is partly owned by Senator John McCain’s wife. Former Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura’s election as an independent candidate proves that opening up debates can lead to real change – something the entrenched Republican and Democratic Parties don’t want to see.
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Have Your Say! Rate This Film!
please wait...
Rating: 4.8/5 (21 votes cast)
Who's Afraid of an Open Debate? The Truth About the Commission on Presidential Debates (Full Version), 4.8 out of 5 based on 21 ratings
I noticed that after the debate one of the women in the audience who asked a question clearly knew Mitt Romney’s wife and they hugged each other. I noticed another woman who asked a question also seemed to be friendly with Romney after the debate ended and everyone was taking photos and shaking hands. It would be great if you could post some screen shots of those moments.
I would rather pull out my own teeth with a pair of pliers while listening to The Captain and Tenielle singing ‘Muskrat Love’ than watch Obummer the Lobopresident and Mittens the Sellout fawn over each other at a staged debate. Cockroaches would flee the decay of it all.
Thank you very much for your hard work in exposing secret combinations and giving us more opportunity to do something about it. I’m so proud of the American people who are fighting this corruption and that I have an opportunity to join them. Our government leaders need to keep their promise of upholding the Constitution or be prosecuted and punished.
If the first requirement for participation is evidence of Constitutional Eligibility pursuant to Art II Sec 1, why was Obama permitted into the debates?
I noticed that after the debate one of the women in the audience who asked a question clearly knew Mitt Romney’s wife and they hugged each other. I noticed another woman who asked a question also seemed to be friendly with Romney after the debate ended and everyone was taking photos and shaking hands. It would be great if you could post some screen shots of those moments.
I would rather pull out my own teeth with a pair of pliers while listening to The Captain and Tenielle singing ‘Muskrat Love’ than watch Obummer the Lobopresident and Mittens the Sellout fawn over each other at a staged debate. Cockroaches would flee the decay of it all.
Thank you very much for your hard work in exposing secret combinations and giving us more opportunity to do something about it. I’m so proud of the American people who are fighting this corruption and that I have an opportunity to join them. Our government leaders need to keep their promise of upholding the Constitution or be prosecuted and punished.
Great information! We need diversity of opinions in the debates
If the first requirement for participation is evidence of Constitutional Eligibility pursuant to Art II Sec 1, why was Obama permitted into the debates?
[...] [...]