The Power of Nightmares: Part 3 – The Shadows in the Cave (Full Version)

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Have Your Say! Rate This Film!
Rating: 3.9/5 (7 votes cast)

This final episode addresses the actual rise of al-Qaeda. Curtis argues that, after their failed revolutions, bin Laden and Zawahiri had little or no popular support, let alone a serious complex organization of terrorists, and were dependent upon independent operatives to carry out their new call for jihad. However, the film argues that in order to prosecute bin Laden in absentia for the 1998 U.S. embassy bombings, US prosecutors had to prove he was the head of a criminal organization responsible for the bombings. They find a former associate of bin Laden, Jamal al-Fadl, and pay him to testify that bin Laden was the head of a massive terrorist organization called “al-Qaeda”. With the September 11th attacks, Neo-Conservatives in the new Republican government of George W. Bush use this created concept of an organization to justify another crusade against a new evil enemy, leading to the launch of the War on Terrorism.

After the American invasion of Afghanistan fails to uproot the alleged terrorist network, the Neo-Conservatives focus inwards, searching unsuccessfully for terrorist sleeper cells in America. They then extend the war on “terror” to a war against general perceived evils with the invasion of Iraq in 2003. The ideas and tactics also spread to the United Kingdom where Tony Blair uses the threat of terrorism to give him a new moral authority. The repercussions of the Neo-Conservative strategy are also explored with an investigation of indefinitely-detained terrorist suspects in Guantanamo Bay, many allegedly taken on the word of the anti-Taliban Northern Alliance without actual investigation on the part of the United States military, and other forms of “preemption” against non-existent and unlikely threats made simply on the grounds that the parties involved could later become a threat. Curtis also makes a specific attempt to allay fears of a dirty bomb attack, and concludes by reassuring viewers that politicians will eventually have to concede that some threats are exaggerated and others altogether devoid of reality. “In an age when all the grand ideas have lost credibility, fear of a phantom enemy is all the politicians have left to maintain their power.” More at Wikipedia.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Have Your Say! Rate This Film!
Rating: 3.9/5 (7 votes cast)
SPOiLER: How a Third Political Party Could Win (Full Version), 4.6 out of 5 based on 11 ratings
< |||| > 1 2 3 4 5

SPOiLER: How a Third Political Party Could Win (Full Version)

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Have Your Say! Rate This Film!
Rating: 4.6/5 (11 votes cast)

2011 – SPOILER explores the political, economic and philosophic ethos of the past 98 years for insights into the debt-driven, welfare-warfare state and ways Americans can get back to a Constitutional republic. Analyzing the reasons no third party has been successful since John C. Fremont and Abraham Lincoln ran on the new Republican Party around 1860, SPOiLER offers a platform — based on the political strategies of Nelson Hultberg — that could inspire an existing, or new, third party to win, thus putting an end to the DemoPublican monopoly.

 

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Have Your Say! Rate This Film!
Rating: 4.6/5 (11 votes cast)
SPOiLER: How a Third Political Party Could Win (Full Version), 4.6 out of 5 based on 11 ratings
Report Broken Video Link

3 comments to SPOiLER: How a Third Political Party Could Win (Full Version)

What Did You Think? Leave a Reply

Republic Broadcasting Live Stream