Breaking the Taboo (Full Version)

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Have Your Say! Rate This Film!
Rating: 4.0/5 (11 votes cast)

Narrated by Oscar winning actor Morgan Freeman, “Breaking the Taboo” is produced by Sam Branson’s indie Sundog Pictures and Brazilian co-production partner Spray Filmes and was directed by Cosmo Feilding Mellen and Fernando Grostein Andrade. Featuring interviews with several current or former presidents from around the world, such as Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter, the film follows The Global Commission on Drug Policy on a mission to break the political taboo over the United States led War on Drugs and expose what it calls the biggest failure of global policy in the last 40 years.
 

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Have Your Say! Rate This Film!
Rating: 4.0/5 (11 votes cast)
Not Business As Usual, 4.1 out of 5 based on 11 ratings
< |||| > 1 2 3 4 5

Not Business As Usual

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Have Your Say! Rate This Film!
Rating: 4.1/5 (11 votes cast)

2014 – Not Business As Usual is a provocative look at capitalism and its unintended price of success. The film tracks the changing landscape of business with the rising tide of conscious capitalism through the stories of local entrepreneurs who have found innovative ways to bring humanity back into business.

 

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Have Your Say! Rate This Film!
Rating: 4.1/5 (11 votes cast)
Not Business As Usual, 4.1 out of 5 based on 11 ratings

2 comments to Not Business As Usual

  • As you get into this video-businesses should be this way, giving up front-helping employees and customers-being out there-making a better world-capitalism is making a better world no about greed.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • FO

    While I agree with the specific messages portrayed in this film (stewardship of the environment and social responsibility), I hope that people recognize the prevailing ideology behind this film. Simply put, it reeks of Marxism-Leninism 2.0. In my opinion, it’s films like this that have earned Greens the nickname “Watermelons” (Green on the outside, red in the middle).

    Let’s not get too caught up on the ideas presented on the surface of this film, because I think we can all agree on those things. It is the prevailing ideology behind the causes which is much more surreptitious, insidious, and ultimately dangerous for liberty and the rule of law.

    Marxism-Leninism presumes that nature (and by extension, commerce) is fundamentally flawed, and thus man must step in, usually in the form of a state acting on behalf of its ruling class who know what is “right” for the collective, in order to prevent society from drifting into chaos. In all practicality, Marxist-Leninist ideology can be most easily recognized when the argument is made that the state must intervene in natural processes such as commerce, by way of statutory regulation, in order to curb bad behavior. This seems reasonable, except that anyone familiar with Machiavelli is aware of how the state masquerades as the dispenser of justice, while in actuality serving the interests of those with money and power. This is why more government never seems to effectively eradicate the corruption that we all sense lurking beneath the surface.

    I realize that taking the state out of regulating commerce sounds a lot like laissez-fair capitalism, however, it couldn’t be further from the truth.There is one thing that laissez-fair capitalism lacks that Adam Smith and most libertarians have fundamentally come to understand, and that is that the rule of law is the most important premise in a truly free and just society, and provided it is firmly in place, a complex web of regulations are not necessary in order to effective curb bad behavior.

    The rule of law does not mean rule by statutory law, which essentially amounts to rule by written decree. Instead, it is rule by those few laws which have generally been observed by all civilized societies throughout history. These laws can be seen as natural law, and it is the observance of these laws and their limitations which determine the legitimacy of a government, or any other institution within a society for that matter. More importantly, due to the “less is more” nature of law, a society which observes natural law is much more capable of dealing with those who deviate from the boundaries of what is acceptable.

    If you wish to measure the legitimacy of any public institution, corporate or civil, then consider its observance of one’s birth right. Your birth right is simply your right to life, liberty, and to pursue your own happiness without restriction. You gained this birth right by virtue of your humanity. It means that you are entitled to unlimited freedom, so long as you don’t interfere with the birth right of any other human being. In this regard, acting in bad faith in commerce, including harming the environment, is an infringement on the birthrights of all those affected. This is how natural law works.

    So in short, yes to natural law, no to increased regulation. Every regulation has a loop hole, and it is not meant to benefit you or I or the environment. If you agree with the values expressed on the surface of this film, I encourage you to research natural law, common law, and liberty, because it is in these subjects that you will find remedy for the issues which plague us today.

    Marxism-Leninism is, at its core, a repugnant and malignant ideology, whereas natural law is simply an observance of the natural boundaries of acceptable human behavior. And let’s not forget that ideology prevails where common sense and reason break down. So for the these reasons, I’m giving this film one star.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 2 votes)

What Did You Think? Leave a Reply

Republic Broadcasting Live Stream