Shots in the Dark: Silence on Vaccine

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Have Your Say! Rate This Film!
Rating: 5.0/5 (3 votes cast)

Following the increase in cases of autism and other immune disorders among some particularly vulnerable people, several recognized specialists are questioning the safety of large-scale vaccination. Despite the serious side effects, pharmaceutical companies, the medical profession and government authorities continue to bury their heads in the sand, refusing to see a serious problem. In Quebec, the United States and France, as in most industrialized countries, victims are almost without recourse despite the high toxicity of substances such as mercury and aluminum contained in vaccines. With this hard-hitting documentary, Lina B. Moreco highlights a very worrying public health problem.

Since they were introduced in the early 20th century, vaccines have been a tremendous medical and scientific success. Today perceived as a necessity, they are so familiar to us that their potential risks are rarely mentioned.

However, the stakes are significant. Based on recommendations of health agencies, North American children receive about 48 doses of 14 different vaccines before the age of 6 — double the amount prescribed 25 years earlier. Despite this extraordinary increase, few studies independent of the pharmaceutical industry have been conducted into their long-term side effects. This is a disturbing situation given the numerous toxins, including mercury and aluminum, contained in some commonly administered vaccines.

Several worried pediatricians and scientists are sounding the alarm. Some of the research underway indicates that vaccination is directly responsible for immune or neurological disorders among certain people genetically or neurologically predisposed to react badly to vaccine components. Cases of autism, multiple sclerosis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, macrophagic myofasciitis, encephalitis, paralysis and neuropathies indicate the seriousness of the situation.

Despite these findings, the pharmaceutical industry and government authorities deny there is a serious problem. Relying on perfunctory studies, some of which date back to the late 1920s, they reject out of hand any cause-and-effect relationship. Given the known fact that adding preservatives such as thimerosal (mercury) helps reduce production costs, the reaction of the pharmaceutical industry is at the very least puzzling. Preferring not to question a system that has proved its worth, a majority of the medical profession’s members reject any potential toxicity in vaccines.

http://films.nfb.ca/shots-in-the-dark/

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Have Your Say! Rate This Film!
Rating: 5.0/5 (3 votes cast)
Lethal Injection: The Story Of Vaccination (Full Version), 4.9 out of 5 based on 14 ratings
< |||| > 1 2 3 4 5

Lethal Injection: The Story Of Vaccination (Full Version)

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Have Your Say! Rate This Film!
Rating: 4.9/5 (14 votes cast)

The definitive look into the history of vaccination. From cancer, to autism, to the purposeful sterilization of innocent people around the globe, find out why all of these things are perfectly legal according to U.S. CODE – why the government considers you no different than cattle in their own law.

When I started this project almost three years ago I, like so many researchers before me, got pulled into the same old quotes and statistics surrounding the history of vaccines and of vaccination.

And while these are important factors to consider regarding the vaccine industry, the true nature of the term vaccination is now completely and utterly foreign to what my previous misconception of that word was.

Before we can begin to comprehend just what the word vaccination really means we must first break down into simple terms what the purpose of a vaccine is.
 

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Have Your Say! Rate This Film!
Rating: 4.9/5 (14 votes cast)
Lethal Injection: The Story Of Vaccination (Full Version), 4.9 out of 5 based on 14 ratings
Report Broken Video Link

2 comments to Lethal Injection: The Story Of Vaccination (Full Version)

  • woodruff

    If you get past the seemingly endless and very dry reading from public documents at the beginning of this film it turns interesting. Takes several “right” turns into channels of which I am personallly sceptical. For example, the film alleges that soft drink companies use aborted fetal tissue in the manufacture of their products.

    “Oh my God. I’m drinking dead babies”

    The film does not elaborate. In fact, they may use aborted fetal tissue but only in an indirect way. They are alledged to use cell lines to test flavor enhancement technolgy that is used to make their products seem to taste better . Taste enhancement=> using less of expensive ingredients =more profit. This is an entirely different issue.

    Yes it may kill you through excitotxin (nerve damage) effects but really a stretch to bring it into a vaccine related documentary.

    Or not,it depends….. For me it was a sensationalist and really did not fit with the theme of the film. The topic of “flavor enhancement” and excitotoxins is a subject unto itself.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: -2 (from 2 votes)
  • Dear woodruff-
    That is a totally species argument to those of us who object to any commercialization of human fetal tissue. Your rigid clinging to it reveals way more than I think you intended to reveal. The argument here is about one’s legacy. Certain God given rights that were supposedly protected by our Constitution. I would never consent to any totalitarian birth control. Why am I allowing this?

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

What Did You Think? Leave a Reply

Republic Broadcasting Live Stream