Legalize Democracy

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Have Your Say! Rate This Film!
Rating: 3.9/5 (8 votes cast)

2014 – Move To Amend http://movetoamend.org
Formed in September 2009, Move to Amend is a coalition of hundreds of organizations and hundreds of thousands of individuals committed to social and economic justice, ending corporate rule, and building a vibrant democracy that is genuinely accountable to the people, not corporate interests.
We are calling for an amendment to the US Constitution to unequivocally state that inalienable rights belong to human beings only, and that money is not a form of protected free speech under the First Amendment and can be regulated in political campaigns.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Have Your Say! Rate This Film!
Rating: 3.9/5 (8 votes cast)
Hy.poth.e.sis, 4.7 out of 5 based on 26 ratings
< |||| > 1 2 3 4 5

Hy.poth.e.sis

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Have Your Say! Rate This Film!
Rating: 4.7/5 (26 votes cast)

‘Hy.poth.e.sis’ is a documentary film that follows physics professor Steven E. Jones during a pivotal point in his life. In 2005, Steven went public with a controversial theory regarding the collapse of the World Trade Center on 9/11. His assertion that the collapse was likely the result of pre-positioned explosives rather than the hijacked planes resulted in a backlash from the community and even threatened his standing as a professor at BYU. Despite hate mail, threats, and even bribery to end his research, Steven refused to give in to overwhelming pressure and continued his pursuit of the truth.

 

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Have Your Say! Rate This Film!
Rating: 4.7/5 (26 votes cast)
Hy.poth.e.sis, 4.7 out of 5 based on 26 ratings
Report Broken Video Link

10 comments to Hy.poth.e.sis

  • Kieron O'Neill

    My understanding of basic physics is simple but clear. What Dr jones explains is simple and clear.

    My concern is, a large percentage of people either don’t want to believe what they are being told, and refuse to face the facts. Alternatively, they don’t understand basic physics and I can’t believe that !

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: +5 (from 5 votes)
  • Kieron O'Neill

    It’s something I omitted to say on my post.
    Dr Jones, you have a tremendous amount of guts. Thank you.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: +3 (from 3 votes)
  • The basic laws of physics speak for themselves. However, the reality of what Dr Jones explains is very, very difficult to digest – primarily because the human intellect just doesn’t want to comprehend and/or accept that a governmental administration could engage in the ‘obvious’ deception of 9-11.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Rich

    Great job. Would like to show all the people who think 9/11 truthers are nuts. Building 7 is always the key.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Sarah

    I can’t imagine why anyone would refuse to question this……I guess it is easier for them to not think about it, and just go about their life. Unfortunately, they will be in for a big shock as time goes on and they finally realize the severity of the situation. Although, I cannot comprehend how 9/11 wasn’t enough. Building 7……that should have been enough. You would be surprised how many people didn’t even know about building 7 until I explained it to them . Where were they?

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)
  • Aibi

    Prof. Jones redeeming himself after forcing Fleischmann and Pons to go public with their cold fusion discovery long before they had completed their experiments.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Kieron

    I don’t understand the comment from Abili. If you have an gripe with Dr Jones regarding another issue,address that. However his simple analysis on 911 is concise and understandable. Where are the questions ? If there are questions. Let s have a new inquiry, simply !

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • americans just can not handle the truth- even when its staring them right in the face; they CHOOSE to deny it.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Don

    Noam Chomsky criticizes 9/11 scientific researchers as not subjecting their research to peer review. I think this is an example that academia can be just as corrupt as any other institution even with peer review.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • [...] Hy.poth.e.sis – A Physics Professor Ousted from Academia for Questioning Official 9/11 Story [...]

What Did You Think? Leave a Reply

Republic Broadcasting Live Stream